|
For over two
hundred years no other idea than that of the premillennial return of Christ was entertained by the primitive
Church. The writings of the Church Fathers abound in evidence of the fact. But about 250 A.D., Origen, one of the
fathers, conceived the idea that the words of Scripture were but the husk in which were were hid the kernel of
Scripture truth. At once he began to allegorize and spiritualize Scripture, and thus founded that school of
interpreters from which the Church and the Bible have suffered so much. As time went on, the prophetic portions of
the Word of God became a sealed book, and ignorance, like the gloom of night, settled down upon all Christendom,
and innumerable errors prowled through the midnight blackness, threatening the utter extinction of the Gospel. But
amid the gloom God was not without witnesses to the truth. The Waldenses, Paulicians and other sects, believed in
the premillennial return of the Lord.
But that doctrine
was not the only one that was eclipsed during the "dark ages;" the doctrine of justification by faith disappeared
in the thick darkness, and star after star went out. But the gloom was not eternal. When the fullness of time was
come, that "Morning Star of the Reformation," John Wycliffe arose and was followed by Luther, and Calvin and Knox
and with the resurrection of the doctrine of justification by faith, the doctrine of the premillennial return of
the Lord was revived. When the persecution aroused by the Reformation ceased, the time of peace and prosperity
became as it always has been in the history of the Church, a time of peril. Rationalism refused to believe that the
world was ripening for judgment and a new way of interpreting the prophecies appeared. Daniel Whitby, in the early
part of the eighteenth century propounded the theory which is generally held at the present time by those who are
not expecting the Lord's return till after the Millennium. He taught that the Millennium was not a reign of persons
raised from the dead, but of the Church flourishing gloriously for a thousand years after the conversion and
restoration of the Jews to their own land; and then Christ would come the second time.
Thus, postmillennialsm, as advocated in our day is not yet two hundred years old, while premillennialsm dates back
to the days of Isaiah and Daniel. (The Christian Herald and Signs of Our Times, Dec. 3, 1890, pp.
774-775).
|